One of the things I strongly support is marriage equality. I specifically did major research projects on Proposition 8 in California and the Manhattan Declaration. This afternoon in Michael Eric Dyson's book "Know What I Mean" I came across this (FYI "the president" refers to George W. Bush as the book was published in 2007):
The president appeals to conservative evangelical beliefs about sexuality and gender, and a narrow, literal reading of the Bible that appeals to a lot of blacks and Latinos. That always trips me out because I wonder how people who were illiterate less than 150 years ago could be biblical literalists!After all, the same religious folk who historically subscribed to a biblical literalism that castigated black folk and justified our oppression and enslavement now use the same principles of interpretation to justify resistance to gays and lesbians. And many black folk are in league with them.
This is exactly my problem with the Manhattan Declaration (MD) . The writers claim that they identify with Christians in the past who championed the civil rights of minority groups in US history (most notably the abolitionist movement, the women's suffrage movement and the civil rights movement of the mid-20th century) while the document itself is discriminatory. Most egregious is it's use of Dr. King's "Letter From a Birmingham Jail".
I think my biggest gripe with evangelical Christians is their literal interpretation of the Bible and their hypocrisy while ignoring the words and actions of Jesus. Jesus was a champion of the sick, the elderly and the poor. He didn't mention abortion or same sex marriage. The writers of the MD claim to identify with Christians who saved infants from Roman infanticide. Yet they don't seem to be terribly concerned about modern day Chinese infanticide, which is based on gender.
As it happens, I have an uncle who has embraced evangelical Christianity over and against his Jewish heritage. I know he, his wife and their son are far removed from my values and my world view. Their beliefs belong to them as my beliefs belong to me. Fine. We all attended the wedding of a common relative this weekend. The ceremony was secular humanistic and as such, I loved it. I felt it was very personal and unique to the couple of honor. My uncle thought it was "interesting". I know from my research on the MD that Evangelical Christians view marriage strictly in the context of God, Jesus and the Bible. So I am certain that my uncle did not like the ceremony for all of the reasons I loved it. That's his business. I'm sure his wife and son felt the same way.
Another issue that is unique to a great many evangelical Christians is their view on health, or specifically healing the sick. Many of them think that if you simply pray enough and love God and Jesus enough, you can pray away any ailment or affliction. If you don't heal then it's your own fault. I find this stance problematic and offensive on so many levels. It bothers me to my very core. I also think it's in direct opposition to the example set by Jesus. While I'm sure Jesus would want people to pray, I think he also would have wanted others to do whatever is within their physical means to help the sick. Maybe that means cleaning wounds or comforting someone with a disease. Maybe it means stitching up an open cut or setting a broken leg. But I don't think he would have been satisfied to just tell someone to pray when there is work to do.
My husband has horrible knee problems. In a nutshell, he got the bad knee gene. He has had multiple surgeries on each knee and this will be a problem for the rest of his life. There's no escaping it and he faces his challenges head on. He has also spent his entire career working in low performing public schools in economically depressed, socially disadvantaged areas. He feels his talents are best used in those areas. I personally think Jesus would have approved.
My evangelical Christian cousin doesn't remember meeting my husband around 12 years ago, but they did in fact meet. My husband actually spent the day with my cousin and took him out to a local go-cart and video game place for some fun. There are passages in the bible that discuss hospitality. As a Christian my cousin should certainly remember the kindness my husband showed him. This weekend, at a family wedding none the less, when the subject of my husband's knee problems came up, my evangelical cousin had the nerve to tell my husband that it's his own fault that he has knee problems. My husband apparently just needs to pray for forgiveness and all will be healed. (Apparently the good he does within the public schools and the community is irrelevant.)
I should add that this self righteous jerk has embraced "Christian Hip Hop". When I heard about that a few years ago it disgusted me. This white boy who grew up in a white, middle class neighborhood and has no ties to the black community at all, has taken a black art form that grew out of black culture and subjugated it to suit his own means. On top of that, he bought his house at a really good deal because it was in foreclosure. Which means this nice Christian boy gained from someone else's misfortune. Nice. So much for compassionate conservatism and for putting the "Christ" in Christianity!